<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iSCSI&#8217;s Bad Luck!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/</link>
	<description>Covering Data Center Availability, Responsiveness and Converged Infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Soissidityhot</title>
		<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Soissidityhot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.egenera.com/?p=76#comment-94</guid>
		<description>god resource Continue also</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god resource Continue also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.egenera.com/?p=76#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I have worked on iSCSI SANs with 100's and 1000's of initiators.

As far as 10GigE, there are very few ways to deploy this today.  Most storage vendors don't support it, and when they do, they don't have enough performance to even justify 10G connections.  10G-baseT is still in the process of being deployed, XFP+ and 10G-Base-CX4 standards are there, but the connectivity expected for storage will most likely be based on 10G-baseT and SFP+.

Also, TOE enabled NICs have been available on 1GigE for awhile, and are standard now on most platforms.  The reality, for iSCSI, and most workloads and most applications, 1GigE is still the right connectivity.  Only is large block( 1MB+), streaming HD video types of application is anything other then iSCSI over 1GigE recommended.

10G I see as a convergence from an edge core perspective, as well as for limiting the number of cables for larger virtualization platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked on iSCSI SANs with 100&#8217;s and 1000&#8217;s of initiators.</p>
<p>As far as 10GigE, there are very few ways to deploy this today.  Most storage vendors don&#8217;t support it, and when they do, they don&#8217;t have enough performance to even justify 10G connections.  10G-baseT is still in the process of being deployed, XFP+ and 10G-Base-CX4 standards are there, but the connectivity expected for storage will most likely be based on 10G-baseT and SFP+.</p>
<p>Also, TOE enabled NICs have been available on 1GigE for awhile, and are standard now on most platforms.  The reality, for iSCSI, and most workloads and most applications, 1GigE is still the right connectivity.  Only is large block( 1MB+), streaming HD video types of application is anything other then iSCSI over 1GigE recommended.</p>
<p>10G I see as a convergence from an edge core perspective, as well as for limiting the number of cables for larger virtualization platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadry Tavana</title>
		<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadry Tavana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.egenera.com/?p=76#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Dear SAN Technologiest

Thanks for the comment.  I wonder what your experience (if any) has been running iSCSI on LANs with a healthy number of initiators?  Do you have any experience with iSCSI at 10G with new TOE enabled NIC adapters?

I would be very interested to hear your experiences...

Regards, Sadry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear SAN Technologiest</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  I wonder what your experience (if any) has been running iSCSI on LANs with a healthy number of initiators?  Do you have any experience with iSCSI at 10G with new TOE enabled NIC adapters?</p>
<p>I would be very interested to hear your experiences&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards, Sadry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The SAN Technologist</title>
		<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>The SAN Technologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.egenera.com/?p=76#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;iSCSI Scavengers &#8211; The Vultures Circle and The Hyenas Pick at Scraps...&lt;/strong&gt;


Image via Wikipedia

&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; The iSCSI market has been in the spotlight for the past 12-18 months within the Storage Industry.&#160; My first interaction with the iSCSI storage protocol as way back in 2001 and 2002.&#160; I working on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>iSCSI Scavengers &ndash; The Vultures Circle and The Hyenas Pick at Scraps&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Image via Wikipedia</p>
<p>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; The iSCSI market has been in the spotlight for the past 12-18 months within the Storage Industry.&#160; My first interaction with the iSCSI storage protocol as way back in 2001 and 2002.&#160; I working on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.egenera.com/2008/08/iscsis-bad-luck/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.egenera.com/?p=76#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ip packet...&lt;/strong&gt;

You have got to be kidding!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ip packet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You have got to be kidding!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
